The above chart shows a history of the Church,
including all major 'separations' or 'branches' that have
occurred during the past 2000 years. As can be seen, the Old
Catholic churches separated from the Roman church in 1874,
returning to a theology that basically parallels that of the
Eastern Orthodox churches.
Historical Validations
Utrecht
receives Rights of Autonomy from Blessed Pope Eugene III in
1145.
This Right is confirmed by Pope Leo in 1215 and
becomes known universally as the Leonine Privilege.
Privilege subsequently reconfirmed in two Church Councils in
1520 and 1717.
Recent Validations
Dominus Iesus issued by the Roman Catholic
Magisterium in the year 2000, signed by John Paul II on June 16,
and Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger on August 6, states:
"The churches which, while not existing in
perfect communion with the (Roman) Catholic Church, remain
united to her by means of the closest bonds, that is, by
Apostolic Succession
and a valid Eucharist, are true particular churches."
A Concordat was signed between the Holy Father,
Pope Paul VI, and Archbishop Glazmaker of Utrecht in 1976,
recognizing the Catholic status of one another and the validity
of one another's Sacraments.
"The Roman Church recognizes the validity of Old
Catholic Orders and Sacraments." 1974, Catholic Almanac, Our
Sunday Visitor
"The Old Catholics, like the Orthodox, possess a
valid priesthood." Separated Brethren, William J. Whalen"
...Catholics may receive the Eucharist, penance
or anointing from sacred ministers of non-Catholic denominations
whose Orders are considered valid by the Catholic Church. This
includes all Eastern Orthodox priests, priests of the Old
Catholic and the Polish National Church." A Catholic Guide to
the New Code of Canon Law, Thomas P. Doyle, OP
"...Ordinations performed by the bishops of the Old Catholic
Church are considered valid." A Practical Commentary on the Code
of Canon Law, Rev. Stanislaw Woywood, OFM, LLB
The Declaration of
Utrecht
September 24, 1889
1. We adhere faithfully to the Rule
of Faith laid down by St. Vincent of Lerins in these terms:
“Id teneamus, quod ubique, quod semper, quod ab omnibus
creditum est; hoc est etenim vere proprieque catholicum.”
For this reason we preserve in professing the faith of the
primitive Church, as formulated in the oecumenical symbols
and specified precisely by the unanimously accepted
decisions of the Oecumenical Councils held in the undivided
Church of the first thousand years.
2. We therefore reject the decrees of
the so-called Council of the Vatican, which were promulgated
July 18th, 1870, concerning the infallibility and the
universal Episcopate of the Bishop of Rome, decrees which
are in contradiction with the faith of the ancient Church,
and which destroy its ancient canonical constitution by
attributing to the Pope the plentitude of ecclesiastical
powers over all Dioceses and over all the faithful. By
denial of this primatial jurisdiction we do not wish to deny
the historical primacy which several Oecumenical ouncils and
Fathers of the ancient Church have attributed to the Bishop
of Rome by recognizing him as the Primus inter pares.
3. We also reject the dogma of the
Immaculate Conception promulgated by Pius IX in 1854 in
defiance of the Holy Scriptures and in contradiction to the
tradition of the centuries.
4. As for other Encyclicals published
by the Bishops of Rome in recent times for example, the
Bulls Unigenitus and Auctorem fidei, and the
Syllabus of 1864, we reject them on all such points as are
in contradiction with the doctrine of the primitive Church,
and we do not recognize them as binding on the consciences
of the faithful. We also renew the ancient protests of the
Catholic Church of Holland against the errors of the Roman
Curia, and against its attacks upon the rights of national
Churches.
5. We refuse to accept the decrees of
the Council of Trent in matters of discipline, and as for
the dogmatic decisions of that Council we accept them only
so far as they are in harmony with the teaching of the
primitive Church.
6. Considering that the Holy
Eucharist has always been the true central point of Catholic
worship, we consider it our right to declare that we
maintain with perfect fidelity the ancient Catholic doctrine
concerning the Sacrament of the Altar, by believing that we
receive the Body and Blood of our Saviour Jesus Christ under
the species of bread and wine. The Eucharistic celebration
in the Church is neither a continual repetition nor a
renewal of the expiatory sacrifice which Jesus offered once
for all upon the Cross: but it is a sacrifice because it is
the perpetual commemoration of the sacrifice offered upon
the Cross, and it is the act by which we represent upon
earth and appropriate to ourselves the one offering which
Jesus Christ makes in Heaven, according to the Epistle to
the Hebrews 9:11-12, for the salvation of redeemed humanity,
by appearing for us in the presence of God (Heb. 9:24). The
character of the Holy Eucharist being thus understood, it
is, at the same time, a sacrificial feast, by means of which
the faithful in receiving the Body and Blood of our Saviour,
enter into communion with one another (I Cor. 10:17).
7. We hope that Catholic theologians,
in maintaining the faith of the undivided Church, will
succeed in establishing an agreement upon questions which
have been controverted ever since the divisions which arose
between the Churches. We exhort the priests under our
jurisdiction to teach, both by preaching and by the
instruction of the young, especially the essential Christian
truths professed by all the Christian confessions, to avoid,
in discussing controverted doctrines, any violation of truth
or charity, and in word and deed to set an example to the
members.
8. By maintaining and professing
faithfully the doctrine of Jesus Christ, by refusing to
admit those errors which by the fault of men have crept into
the Catholic Church, by laying aside the abuses in
ecclesiastical matters, together with the worldly tendencies
of the hierarchy, we believe that we shall be able to combat
efficaciously the great evils of our day, which are unbelief
and indifference in matters of religion.